Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan

Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article

There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 00:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Current photos

[[Image:Povarskaya 42 Ponizovsky Building by Lev Kekyshev.jpg|right|thumb|Afghan Embassy in Moscow]]
[[Image:Waw afganistan12.jpg|thumb|right|Afghan Embassy in Warsaw]]
[[Image:Afghan Embassy in Canberra.jpg|right|thumb|Afghan Embassy in Canberra]]

Ikip (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Germany

This seems trivial, and is the only real content of the Afghanistan–Germany relations page:

The relations between Germany and Afghanistan began during World War I. People of Afghanistan referred to Germany as German kākā ("uncle German").

Ikip (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516214607/http://www.mfa.gov.af/afMission.asp to http://www.mfa.gov.af/afMission.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

2021 update necessary with Taliban

There should be some update, or symbol, denoting which of the diplomatic missions are closed, which are "kept open by the Republic in exile" and which are "officially run by the Afghan government under the Taliban". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:C39F:A200:FC62:BFE5:6CD9:581A (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done, separated by government represented. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 20:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

@2607:FEA8:C39F:A200:FC62:BFE5:6CD9:581A Currently Afghan embassy in Iraq,Netherland,Spain,Czech Republic, Afghan consulate in Ankara,Turkey and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia is fully under the control of Taliban regime.But why you have not updated yet? 114.130.181.254 (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

"Standard format"

@Aquintero82: Please provide the relevant MoS item and/or discussion that established this "standard format" that prevents me from grouping missions by the government they represent. I have not been able to find one. I believe it is important to separate out which missions are controlled by which government because they are representing different entities and serving radically different purposes (and the IP in the above section also had the idea, BTW). I did not make any other changes to the formatting than drawing a distinction between the Taliban and the western-backed governments. If this "standard format" does exist somewhere, I'd imagine the kind of diplomatic nightmare Afghanistan is currently embroiled in was not foreseen in its design. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 20:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)