Talk:List of cryptozoologists

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cryptozoology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Incomplete

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This list is far from complete. If anyone wants to add a few names, feel free! Zagalejo 20:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Robert W. Morgan

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have confused one Robert W. Morgan with another, and have hyper linked to the wrong one. The one pertaining to the page, the Cryptozoologist described, is in fact NOT dead, but alive and quite well. The mistake is with another Robert W. Morgan, from the same State as the Cryptozoologist, who was a DJ and HAS passed away some years ago. Fixing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.80.21.88 (talk) 04:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:List of cryptozoologists/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Could use more names and reference citations and references. Badbilltucker 20:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Substituted at 04:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Assessed the importance as High for WP:Cryptozoology because cryptozoologists are the main drivers of the field of cryptozoology --Contrawwftw (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Name change?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I understand the reason for this article, but why lump skeptics under the label "List of Cryptozoologists"? Seems unnecessarily complicated KanyeWestDropout (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why so many non-notable people on this list?

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

According to WP:LISTPEOPLE, a person is typically included in a list of people only if the person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement. Normally this means that there is a separate article about that person. However in this list there are well over 100 people included who have no article (and are redlinked). Is there a reason why WP:LISTPEOPLE seems to be so flagrantly violated in this article? CodeTalker (talk) 19:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@CodeTalker: Please WP:BB and cull the non-notable names. – S. Rich (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I have removed all entries which do not have an associated article; that is, all redlinked entries. CodeTalker (talk) 03:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic