Talk:List of countries and territories where Portuguese is an official language

Latest comment: 3 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Various comments edit

Until then, it had been a home language, and communication was done through trade languages based on Tupi and influenced by Latin and Portuguese.
What is a "home language" and a "trade language"?

Not confusing at all. most spoken and first language are very different things. There are aticles that can help you: First language, home language, second language. Trade language is used in the sense that it is the language used for communication with the native people to trade. -Pedro 19:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, you're right, and I had already deleted my silly doubt.

Extiction of Iberian languages planned? edit

I do have one more comment, though (at least):

A strong romanization led to the complete extinction of all the former native languages, as planned by Roman Emperors such as Caesar Augustus.

What is the source for claiming that Augustus or other Roman emperors actually planned the extinction of the local languages? I had never heard about this. FilipeS 19:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Well, filipe, I think Augustus did not planned any extinction. He was interesting in the development and stability of the Roman Empire. Thus the spread of the Latin culture and language were important to reach his goals. See a biography of Caesar Augustus or the history of that period for more information on the Romanization policy. look at this map: [1]. A curiosity: Britain and the Basque country area were not part of the empire then.
  • Oh, now I know why you asked that. it's a misinterpretation of yours. Augustus made a strong Romanization, not a persecution against native languages! but that obviously lead to the extinction of the native languages.--Pedro 23:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Linguas Gerais Pidgins? edit

Thanks for the explanation on "home language". Were the línguas gerais really pidgins, though? FilipeS 19:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • they were trade languages, but not pidgins (these languages were based on native languages, not Portuguese). The Portuguese thought there was a common language in Brazil, so they used a Portuguese/Latin-influenced version of it.--Pedro 22:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Type of Portuguese preferred by Africans edit

Although they can understand Portuguese from Brazilian T.V. stations, locals still want to learn standard European Portuguese (including some Chinese), as do East Timor and the PALOP countries.

Needs to be sourced! FilipeS 19:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also, needs clarity. Do they mean Chinese immigrants in Angola/Mozambique want to learn EP? Or, does it mean that along with African nations, people in Macau (China) want to learn EP? Or, what makes no sense at all, does it mean that Luso-Africans want to learn Chinese? 98.64.73.9 (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Tom in FloridaReply

Galician edit

This probably deserves a title of its own...

About the debate on whether Galician is within the Portuguese language, or if it is a different, but close language (as politically the Spanish administration does), see Galician. Galician has been accepted orally as Portuguese in the European Union Parliament and used as such by, among others, the Galician representatives José Posada, Camilo Nogueira and Xosé Manuel Beiras.

I think it's problematic to state that it's "the Spanish administration" which considers Galician a different, though close language, to Portuguese. As far as I know, Galicia has an elected regional government, and it is Galician institutions which have decided the status of Galician with respect to Portuguese (José Posada's symbolic act notwithstanding). FilipeS 19:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC

- Yes and no... Galicia's government passed the language regulations but not without great controversy. The debate lingers on since 1982 and has no easy solution. "Officially" a norm for Galician is used, but this doesn't mean this is accepted by everybody. To be honest, large sectors of the public are simply unaware of all this controversy thus giving way to Spanish to replace Galician language (they perceive Galician as "chaotic", in front of the well-established Spanish). And yet, linguists and academics are still discussing about the "standard norm" with the same intensity as 20 years ago, regardless of what is considered "official". The 1982 norms (the ones used today) were, in fact, a political decision since a draft for the norms completed in 1979 was clearly pro-Portuguese (the draft was revoked overnight and new norms were passed without the approval of the linguistic commission from the University of Santiago de Compostela which, up to that time, was working on it). Look for "Carvalho Calero", "Reintegracionism", "AGAL" and the famous "Decreto Filgueira" for a better understanding of this. Some have stated that the only way to put an end to this senseless "internal fight" would be adopting a solution ala Norwegian, that is, having two official written norms, and let people choose (something that was never done, since texts diverging from the "official" norm are systematically rejected by official institutions, etc) - (XP 07/Sept/08)

Portuguese in Africa edit

The Portuguese language especially grew in use after the independence of Portugal's former [African] colonies. Independence movements from Guinea-Bissau to Mozambique saw it as an instrument to achieve their countries' development and national unity. The residents of these countries use the standard European Portuguese.

Are we sure about their using "the standard European Portuguese"? Certainly, Africans do not, generally, have a European pronunciation, and I know their Portuguese has much African vocabulary that European Portuguese does not. This should be checked. FilipeS 19:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • well... upper class speak a very European accent. (there are sources for that on the net. it's common sense, really. As for the rest of the population, interestingly, the accent of men and women can be very different (in Angola and São Tomé). That what I've noticed, but I found no study about that. Women speaking with a more Angolan-like accent. (POV: probably women do not study or are more engaged in their culture.)--Pedro 23:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Madeira and the Azores edit

Independence movements from Guinea-Bissau to Mozambique saw it as an instrument to achieve their countries' development and national unity. Azores and Madeira are among the regions where Portuguese is the official language. The residents of these countries use the standard European Portuguese.

Why are Azores and Madeira being listed as African regions? Aren't they part of Portugal/Europe? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ettiago (talkcontribs)

  Resolved
The Ogre 15:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Anonymous user 195.23.216.224 reverted me arguing that "Geographically speaking (that's what we're talking here) Madeira is in the African Continent". I have reverted him arguing that "Madeira is not considered by the Portuguese governement or people to be in Africa - it is historicaly, politicaly, socialy and culturaly in Europe, even if it's technically in the African Plate". Hope that settles it. The Ogre 17:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

PALOP edit

I see no need whatsoever to merge the PALOP article to this one. What's the point? It's an independent organization of coutries with specific characteristics, and the article isn't even that much of a stub. One article deals with linguistic issues, the other with political ones (try merging the Commonwealth with the geographic distribution of English). I totally disagree with the merge. Waldir talk 13:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

PALOP: Países Africanos de Língua Oficial Portuguesa, African Countries of Portuguese Official Language. It's got everything to do with language. The proper analog to the Commonwealth would be the CPLP, not the PALOP.
Also, "PALOP" is a Portuguese acronym not well recognized in English. Articles in the English language Wikipedia should have English names. FilipeS (talk) 12:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
You're right, the exact analog would be CPLP. But then again, why not merging CPLP into this article too, for the same reasons? Waldir talk 12:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, the first thing that drew my attention was the name of the article PALOP, which I'm sure is incomprehensible to most English speakers. We should not be so parochial as to assume that people who do not speak Portuguese are familiar with our acronyms.
A good reason to keep the Community of Portuguese Language Countries article separate from this is that it is indeed its own political entity, not just a label for a linguistic reality. I'm not sure that the PALOP are a political entity as well (this may be simply my ignorance). If it is an official political organization, then I'm O.K. with keeping it separate from this article, but I think it should be renamed. Regards. FilipeS (talk) 12:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
It is indeed a political entity. Many cooperation policies exist among the countries and bewtween PALOP and Portugal, for instance (Actually, I benefit from one of such agreements myself, as a cape-verdean graduate student in Portugal). But you're totally right in saying that the article should be renamed. I understand your point, and agree. So, what name do you propose? "African Countries of Official Portuguese Language"? Waldir talk 13:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for being a little insisting, but the fact that there are protocols between PALOP countries does not necessarily mean that the PALOP exists officially as an organization. You spoke earlier of the Commonwealth; the PALOP could be an unofficial community, like the Anglosphere, or Latin America.
It would be nice if we could find some reference that confirmed the existence of the PALOP as a political entity. Do you know if they have an official website? I looked for it, but, although I find many pages that mention the PALOP, I did not find a website of the PALOP itself. (The CPLP has one.)
Still, in the same spirit as the Anglosphere article, I guess there could be a PALOP article. If they had a website with a version in English, we could use their own translation to name the article...
I'm withdrawing the merger proposal. If you can find an official translation of PALOP into English, feel free to rename the article. FilipeS (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Insisting? Discussion is the path to enlightment! :)
Regarding the protocols, I was thinking of the external ones, rather than the internal ones. For example, in Portugal people from the PALOP have less strict conditions regarding immigrant laws. There are many other examples like this -- I'm sure some of them illustrate better my point. I don't think Portugal would sign agreements with each one of the 5 countries of the PALOP to implement such measures, but rather sign a protocol with the representative entity. Of course, they could have done it one by one, and I'm not sure they havent -- actually, after this discussion I'm starting to have doubts that the organization is an official, political one.
But in any case, I think we both agree that the article's worth keeping, since it has its own particularities, covers a specific part of the portuguese speaking community, and even if unofficial, is frequently acknowledged in the media and is noteworthy since portuguese is spoken not only in an informal basis, but is legally the official language of the countries.
About the translation to english, I never heard of any, but I'll try to find out something. Regards, Waldir talk 15:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, apparently the most usual name is "Portuguese Speaking African Countries", as can be shown by the examples below:
What do you think? Waldir talk 15:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you know how to move an article, go ahead. Include a few of the more serious links as references. FilipeS (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done. I moved the article, and corrected all (ufff!) incoming links. Waldir talk 18:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good job. Just a note: you don't need to worry too much about changing the incoming links. I just changed a few for esthetic reasons. What you should be on the look out for are double redirects. (But don't worry, there aren't any double redirects to the new page; I checked. ;-)) Regards. FilipeS (talk) 20:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, there were, but I corrected them ;) But as a perfectionist, I couldnt resist to change all the other ones too xD. Btw, take a look at the edit summary of this edit. Apparently, the acronym's more well-known than we though, huh? ;-)
One last note: I forgot to add the external links to the article. Can you take care of that? I'll have to leave the PC for a while now. Waldir talk 21:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done. :-) FilipeS (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removing Galician from the calculations edit

The infobox data for Spain treats Galician as a variant of the Portuguese language. We should alter that, as it's blatant Portuguese POV (Galician is officially recognized as a separate language. Its classification as a dialect of Portuguese is disputed and mostly supported by the Portuguese linguist community only). Húsönd 13:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

- wrote "mostly supported by the Portuguese linguist community only"... Let me add: and many Galician linguists too :P I mean... the interested parties (see "AGAL"). Thus, nobody denies that Galician and Portuguese form a dialect continuum and that they are part of the same diasystem, so... maybe not a "dialect of", but certainly variants of the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.244.151 (talk) 10:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Most Portuguese dont care about the linguistic issue of Galician, why people would? Maybe linguists care, because that's their job. Galician info is being added to Portuguese articles, even adding Galician bias by Galicians themselves. Only in Husond puzzle bobble world, Galician is a completely separate language from Portuguese. The issues concerning the situation of Galician is a debate in Galician only, not in Portugal. ---Pedro (talk) 10:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Map of the portuguese language in the world.png Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Map of the portuguese language in the world.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Loaned words from Portuguese edit

Malayalam language, spoken in Kerala in South India has many loan-words from Portuguese (please see Loan words in Malayalam).The association dates back to 1498, when Vasco Da Gama landed in kappad near Kozhikode in Kerala. Still, many such loan-words are part of everyday coversation in Malayalam. Can this get a mention under Asia section of this article ?
Anish Viswa 05:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Page title edit

it is better to rename this page from 'Geographic distribution of Portuguese' to some other title having 'Portuguese' as the first word. It will help in having this page appear in searches starting with 'portug-'. Now people won't notice this article easily.
Anish Viswa 01:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Namibia edit

In Namibia it is spoken by less than 2% of the population, though it is dying out

I doubt this information is reliable. The actual data that I introduced based on refugees from Urban Angolans was around 20%. Someone removed the zero, and added "dying out". But I dont longer known the online source, probably it no longer exists. So information from the present day would be much appreciated. -PedroPVZ 10:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Western Hemisphere edit

I changed the information of Brazil being the only lusophone country of the "Western Hemisphere" to being the only one in the Americas. Although some people call the American Continent "Western Hemisphere", this definition is far from being the most used. Among the traditional definitions, such as the Greenwich Meridian, Portugal is in the Western Hemisphere. Just saying Americas remove all the ambiguity of the term Western Hemisphere, excluding, with no doubt, all the other Lusophone nations. 177.182.211.237 (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in List of countries where Portuguese is an official language edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of countries where Portuguese is an official language's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "unpop":

  • From Angola: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2009). "World Population Prospects, Table A.1" (PDF). 2008 revision. United Nations. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 March 2009. Retrieved 12 March 2009. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help); line feed character in |author= at position 42 (help)
  • From Arab League: "World Population Prospects, Table A.1" (PDF). 2008 revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2009: 17. Retrieved 22 September 2010. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • From East Timor: "President Horta announces preliminary census of population's results". Timor Newsline. October 22, 2010. Retrieved October 23, 2010. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • From Namibia: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2009). "World Population Prospects, Table A.1" (PDF). 2008 revision. United Nations. Retrieved 12 March 2009. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • From Guinea-Bissau: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2009). "World Population Prospects, Table A.1" (PDF). 2008 revision. United Nations. Retrieved 12 March 2009. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Note: According to email information by the Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisa, Bissau, the preliminary results of the national population census in Guinea-Bissau put the figure at 1,449,230.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of territorial entities where Portuguese is an official language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Many thanks to the author (s) of this article. We translated a part of your article into the Tatar Language.--A.Khamidullin (talk) 20:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of territorial entities where Portuguese is an official language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of territorial entities where Afrikaans and Dutch are official languages which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply