Talk:List of comedy films of the 2000s

Deletion

Deletetion of sub-topic 'Comedy-Drama' needed. Reason: duplication within article. Monkfishbandana (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

American films

Why does the main list only contain American films? It creates the suggestion that comedy films are American by default, which is not true. Riki (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

2010's

Is there an existing list for 2010-19? If so, it isn't in the list on the top right.

British GM (Not Signed In) 92.7.39.157 (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of comedy films of the 2000s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905010506/http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/maid-in-manhattan-v273847 to http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/maid-in-manhattan-v273847

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of comedy films of the 2000s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120718203752/http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/little-otik-v230271 to http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/little-otik-v230271
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120208121737/http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/eight-legged-freaks-v260297 to http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/eight-legged-freaks-v260297
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/intimate-stories-v275241

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Removal of films with no article but with sources

Hello, @Discospinster:, I see you removed from the list all films that had no WP page. Could we agree that if they have one or more reliable source to verify information and attest a limited notability, they can be reinserted? And other (with the same requirement) added? Quite a few Afds use lists s as targets for redirecting pages about films with tangential notability. And if they end up removed, then, it means that all the efforts to find ATDs were made in vain (and that the consensus that emerged at Afds was in fact not respected). Hope you agree and can reinstate some of the films you have removed. Thank you in advance. Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

What would be sufficient to attest a limited notability? Can you give an example of some of these films? ... discospinster _talk 00:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

At least one reliable source might attest sufficient notability or verifiability to be listed, I'd say. Example, among those you removed: Just Sue Me (and its Afd). But I seem to remember other films I have seen at Afds used to redirect here. Anyway plenty of films are redirected to lists of films (by genre, year, country, etc) as ATD. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 01:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) (Also if they are removed, the redirects are generally deleted after some time (with a "not in the target" rationale.)

The reference given in the entry is just a sparse listing in TVGuide magazine, it only confirms that the film exists, not that there is even limited notability. If every movie that ever came out was listed, the article would just be a directory, which Wikipedia is not. I don't see any difference between that and a college article's alumni section that lists Joe Blow because he was in the local newspaper once. ... discospinster _talk 02:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

You don't? That's too bad. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 02:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)