Talk:List of amphibians and reptiles of Montserrat

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	List of amphibians and reptiles of Montserrat is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caribbean: Montserrat Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Montserrat work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed removal of Eleutherodactylus martinicensis. edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

According to Holliday (2009) - Montserrat - A Guide to the Centre Hills, there are only three amphibian species on the island. E. johnstonei, L. fallax and B. marinus. This is supported by Kaiser's (1992) map of Eleutherodactylus species in the lesser antilles and the IUCN's (Hedges et al. 2012) species profile.

Ref: edit

Holliday, S.H. (2009) Montserrat - A Guide to the Centre Hills. West Indies Publishing Ltd. pp73-78.

Kaiser, H. (1992) The trade mediated introduction of Eleutherodactylus martinicensis Anura Leptodactylidae on St. Barthelemy French Antilles and its implications for Lesser Antillian Biogeography. http://www.academia.edu/1996355/The_trade-mediated_introduction_of_Eleutherodactylus_martinicensis_Anura_Leptodactylidae_on_St._Barthelemy_French_Antilles_and_its_implications_for_Lesser_

Blair Hedges, Beatrice Ibéné, Michel Breuil, Robert Powell 2010. Eleutherodactylus martinicensis. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 22 December 2012 http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/56747/0

Short of complete removal, do you have any other suggestions as to how to address the apparent discrepancy? postdlf (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I would expect that the IUCN's report would be the most accurate, however if you feel removal isn't appropriate perhaps a note alongside the species saying that it is only supported at that location by that particular reference? If that was to be done however the Eleutherodactylus martinicensis page should probably also be updated, as it doesn't include Montserrat in it's species distribution. Bubbling_away (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2012 (ECT)

Let me think about it. I also want to see if I can locate my hardcopy of the other source the list currently cites to see if it's included there. postdlf (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay, brilliant. Let me know once you've had a chance to take a look. Bubbling_away (talk) 12:52, 23 December 2012 (ECT)

Any progress? I think the IUCN is likely to be the most accurate source and they say the species isn't found on the island. Bubbling_away (talk) 18:36, 12 January 2013 (ECT)

Procter & Fleming doesn't have a comprehensive species list, instead covering only "significant species", so it's not helpful. Malhotra & Thorpe don't describe it in the main text, just lists it in the species checklist. So given all of that, we can probably assume the checklist is in error as nothing else collaborates it; let me know if this works for you. I appreciate your effort and discussion. postdlf (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic