Talk:List of abbreviations in photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Back-focus & Front-focus. I have come across these terms abbreviated to BF and FF. However, I hesitate to include these abbreviations in the list. Discussion of these anomalies, on the photography forums, seems to generate more heat than light. The terms could be ambiguous: most discussion concerns camera owners believing (rightly or wrongly) that their camera-lens combination fails to autofocus accurately, producing the sharpest image either beyond ("BF") or in front of ("FF") the desired plane. However, some Wikipedia entries (eg: Focal length) also cover the terms Back Focal Length and Front Focal Length, which relate to lens geometry. Do others think that BF and FF should be included as abbreviations in photography, or is the danger of ambiguity and lack of importance sufficient reason for ignoring them? martinev (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

On two occasions people have, with the best of intentions, corrected 'typos' which they should have left alone. The abbreviation Tv should not be 'corrected' to TV. Tv is the correct abbreviation for Time value: the mode setting where the photographer defines the exposure time (ie: shutter speed) and the AE takes care of the rest. Av is the corresponding abbreviation for Aperture value, where the f-stop is fixed by the photographer. Sv is the abbreviation for Sensitivity value where the photographer sets the ISO value. martinev (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Citations

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Someone added the refimprove tag: "It needs additional citations for verification" in December 2010, soon after this article was created and while it was still work in progress. The article currently has 23 references, 3 bibliographic citations and 8 external links to other bibliographic citations. I propose to delete the refimprove tag by the end of January 2012 unless there is a strong objection. martinev (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

About FF and BF, technically there is no such thing. They are simply symptoms of a focusing system not being calibrated--the system either focuses correctly or it does not, in which case it needs to be adjusted. The problem is actually an image space problem where the image is not being focused at the image plane. It is not an object space problem where the camera cannot focus on the object. The conventions in photography don't allow the image space to be projected on the object space. Having said that, the terms BF and FF are common among photographers. I think making a reference to these terms is acceptable, but the terms need to be framed in a proper way.

Shashinka (talk) 20:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Av & Tv vs A and S

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I may be wrong (can't research at present, sorry), but it feels odd to see Av & Tv suggested as the vendor-neutral versions while A and S are listed as manufacturer variants. Canon and Pentax do the former (and I believe no others), while the page catalogues a rather longer list who do the latter.... Eftpotrm (talk) 12:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of abbreviations in photography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic