This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion
Fast Keep - This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because I created the article. The contents on the article: Hayden, Arizona was written by me and a certain user has continued to remove some of it. I only pasted the content which I personally wrote. therefore, please keep the article. I am also a long time admin.--Tony the Marine (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Having to use "I'm also a long time admin" as an argument to keep an article, should mean an instant desysop as power abuse. Then again, you are hardly an admin in reality, just in name, having not done any admin actions except deleting your own mistake in what, more than 2 years? If the only reason you cling to your admin bitn is to abuse it in deletion discussions about your own creations, then please head over to the burocrats noticeboard and hand in your resignation. Fram (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wow, kind of harsh. I am not abusing my admin. powers. The term used is just to let others know that I know the rules in creating an article, that is all. Tony the Marine (talk) 16:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Uh, no, that's not what being an admin means, and that's not how you should use it. If you knew the rules in creating an article, you wouldn't have created this one in the first place. Fram (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is a fine article just like the 806 other articles which I have contributed to Wikipedia. Take care my friend. Tony the Marine (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Then perhaps these need scrutiny as well? Fram (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Or maybe you should stop harassing me? Let's put an end to this conversation. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh dear, easily harassed are we? There is a very simple way to put an end to a conversation; stop responding. Fram (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because the content in the Hayden, Arizona article was originally written by me. I have tried to include some of my images there, however a certain editor continued to remove them without reason. That is why I wrote this article and used the information which I had created in the first place. Please keep it. Thank you --Tony the Marine (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
