This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Which policy obliges us to retain the source spelling, even if incorrect? We are free, within reason, to adapt sources and correct obvious mistakes; we are not scribes mindlessly copying without filtering or judgment. The steppe in question is connected with the city of Bălți, not with curry. — BiruitorulTalk 22:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
True. If you change it, please also change Crernozem to Chernozem in the other nomination, another glaring spelling mistake by the source. But please leave the reference title as it is. --Tone 23:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
