Talk:List of UEFA European Championship official mascots

This article really needs some photos.--Zlatan Ramić 16:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zlatan Ramić (talkcontribs) Here are some pictures-http://www.midfielddynamo.com/cups/ec/mascots.htm

Rabbit edit

Where does the name "Rabbit" come from. I remember the Swedish character named "Bernie", like the German one. I think the Disney company had a deal, and the Swedish mascot is basically the same as the German with a color change. fr:Mascotte du championnat d'Europe de football 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 22:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Compare this screenshot; File:Berni.gif from article Champions of Europe. The rabbit is called Berni, just like in German, and is copyright 1987, indicating it was an older mascot taken over. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
And compare this sticker album. [1] 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 16:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Use of non-free images in list article. edit

Non-free images such as File:Euro2000mascot.png and File:Mascot of UEFA Euro 2016.jpg cannot be used for "decorative" reasons in tables and lists per WP:NFG and WP:NFLISTS. Each use of a non-free image is required to satisfy all 10 of the criteria for non-free use listed in WP:NFCCP. One of these criteria is WP:NFCC#3 and another is WP:NFCC#8. When a non-free image is used in the infobox of a stand-alone article, such as in Super Victor, NFCC#8 is deemed to be satisfied because the image is being used a the primary means of identification of the subject of the article and its contextual significance is apparent. When non-free images are used in other articles, however, it is much harder to satisfy NFCC#8 per WP:NFC#Meeting the contextual significance criterion. In other words, if the image itself is being discussed in the article and this discussion reflects what reliable sources are saying, then it can be argued that the image is essential to the reader's understanding and it's removal would be detrimental to that understanding. In this case, the images of the mascots are really not the subject of sourced critical commentary at all, but are simply being used to show what the mascot looks like (i.e., "decorative" purposes) using the same essentially explanations found in the stand-alone article or tournament article. The sources cited are also the same. Therefore, the use of the images is not warranted since what the mascot looks like and the same explanation of the image can be found by simply clicking on Super Victor or UEFA Euro 2000. This means that a valid non-free rationale cannot be written for such a usage. For reference, the use of non-free images of mascots in similar articles has been discussed before (See Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 54#FIFA World Cup mascot and WP:NFCR#File:Zakumi.svg) and the result was that such images should not be used in list articles like this.

The two remaining images in the table are "freely licensed" so there are no special restrictions placed upon their use as long as it satisfies WP:IUP. Whether they remain in the article is something to determined through local consensus. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UEFA European Championship mascot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply