Talk:List of The 4400 episodes
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Unlocking the Secrets
editThere's an episode on USA right now. My TiVo says it's called "Unlocking the Secrets" and dates it 2006. It's essentially a clip show summarizing the first two seasons. It should probably be mentioned with the third season? -VJ 21:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, Third season. Matthew Fenton (TALK - CONTRIBS) 21:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Anyone know when the original airdate was? -VJ 22:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Season 4?
editIs there going to be another season?--Migospia 01:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, episode press releases should start coming out soon as well. Matthew 07:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Sourcing
editEpisode titles should not be added until verifiable (press releases, reliable TV listings, etc), the same goes for information in regards to episodes. Matthew 18:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- People, please note that this does NOT include imdb, tv.com, or fan-sites.. Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 20:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- The series info removed has been re-added. Information used to compile it was sourced from the cast or crew of the series - it has not just been fabricated. In addition to this, the template at the head of the section clearly states "It may contain non-definitive information based on commercials, a website or interviews." - We can't get more reliable than the people working on the site. Might add a ref and a spoiler tag to that section. --Dancraggs 11:08, Monday May 7 2007 (UTC)
- Please state from where, with a verifiable source. You "hearing from the cast and crew" is not good enough. See WP:NOR. The tag also doesn't mean you can insert non-cited information, rather that verifiable information may not be factual. Matthew 11:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Had you given me chance to find the sourcing site, I'd have put it on there. It's there now in the section heading. That site has three or four sources for information per episode, including interviews. This is now cited information. --Dancraggs 11:21, Monday May 7 2007 (UTC)
- The4400guide.com is a fansite and blog, hence fails policies and guidelines. Only verifiable secondary/primary sources are acceptable. Matthew 11:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- At least add the broadcast dates of the other episodes to the list. Leave the title as 'TBD' if necessary. --Dancraggs 17:48, Monday May 7 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dancraggs (talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC).
- They're not verifiable either though. The information will appear once it becomes verifiable, keep an eye on USA Network's TV Guide (not to mention empty cells are just clutter...) Matthew 17:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The broadcast dates are at FutonCritic, which you have cited as a verifiable source. Travisl 19:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ah yes, they are indeed (this is why people should/need [to] cite there sources though!). A valid point remains though that it would just be the air date, which on its own (this is just directed at air date) seems quite clutter-ish to me. Unlike a synopsis or a title an air date is (while essential) more a trivial part, that is my opinion anyway -- if consensus differs then I'll accept that. Matthew 19:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's an important fact that a verifiable source is on the record that all 13 episodes will be run on 13 consecutive weeks with no breaks (unlike season 2, which had a one week break in July). Travisl 19:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I believe we could do that with prose? Don't you? We could note it in the lead-in, or (this would personally be by second choice) in the season four section. I'd personally prefer prose over lots of empty cells. I'd perfectly happy noting the straight 13 week run in text, because it is useful information (considering most shows take a break). Matthew 19:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, series such as Lost have breaks before the last five episodes, after the first five episodes, etc. and I recall that when Lost went into end-season break, the dates weren't exactly announced. Anyway, what's a week? byeee 19:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I believe we could do that with prose? Don't you? We could note it in the lead-in, or (this would personally be by second choice) in the season four section. I'd personally prefer prose over lots of empty cells. I'd perfectly happy noting the straight 13 week run in text, because it is useful information (considering most shows take a break). Matthew 19:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's an important fact that a verifiable source is on the record that all 13 episodes will be run on 13 consecutive weeks with no breaks (unlike season 2, which had a one week break in July). Travisl 19:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ah yes, they are indeed (this is why people should/need [to] cite there sources though!). A valid point remains though that it would just be the air date, which on its own (this is just directed at air date) seems quite clutter-ish to me. Unlike a synopsis or a title an air date is (while essential) more a trivial part, that is my opinion anyway -- if consensus differs then I'll accept that. Matthew 19:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The broadcast dates are at FutonCritic, which you have cited as a verifiable source. Travisl 19:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- They're not verifiable either though. The information will appear once it becomes verifiable, keep an eye on USA Network's TV Guide (not to mention empty cells are just clutter...) Matthew 17:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- At least add the broadcast dates of the other episodes to the list. Leave the title as 'TBD' if necessary. --Dancraggs 17:48, Monday May 7 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dancraggs (talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC).
- The4400guide.com is a fansite and blog, hence fails policies and guidelines. Only verifiable secondary/primary sources are acceptable. Matthew 11:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Had you given me chance to find the sourcing site, I'd have put it on there. It's there now in the section heading. That site has three or four sources for information per episode, including interviews. This is now cited information. --Dancraggs 11:21, Monday May 7 2007 (UTC)
- Please state from where, with a verifiable source. You "hearing from the cast and crew" is not good enough. See WP:NOR. The tag also doesn't mean you can insert non-cited information, rather that verifiable information may not be factual. Matthew 11:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The series info removed has been re-added. Information used to compile it was sourced from the cast or crew of the series - it has not just been fabricated. In addition to this, the template at the head of the section clearly states "It may contain non-definitive information based on commercials, a website or interviews." - We can't get more reliable than the people working on the site. Might add a ref and a spoiler tag to that section. --Dancraggs 11:08, Monday May 7 2007 (UTC)
Season 5?
editIs there going to be another season? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.226.52.110 (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- nope, cancelled end of 2007 -- and I am personally happy. I loved the show, in spite of the often too-complex story arcs those poor characters were put through, but WOW that ending episode (which acted as a season ender, plus potential series ender) was FANTASTIC and ended on a perfect note. Kinda like the last "true" episode of Futurama. No need for a Season 5, IMHO. 199.214.27.149 (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge
editI'm suggesting merging all the episode except Pilot (The 4400 episode) and maybe The Great Leap Forward (The 4400 episode), as they are not notable, as they do not provide real-world information (i.e. production, reception). If people are planning to add this, I'm sorry, just trying to help. Everyoneandeveryone (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't agree with the merge. The individual pages have much more information.93.167.68.230 (talk) 20:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- That information would be merged here, not just deleted. Rich Farmbrough, 04:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC).
Proposed merge with The Ballad of Kevin and Tess
editNon-notable episode, should be merged to List of The 4400 episodes as per WP:EPISODE. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Being Tom Baldwin
editArticle about a non-notable episode, should be moved to List of The 4400 episodes as per WP:EPISODE Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 19:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Blink (The 4400)
editNon-notable episode, should be merged to List of The 4400 episodes as per WP:EPISODE. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of The 4400 episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul26/4_thurs/news5thursday.html - Added archive https://archive.is/20150404131511/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul19/3_wed/news4wednesday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul19/3_wed/news4wednesday.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june6/3_wed/news3wednesday.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930180258/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june13/3_wed/news4wednesday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june13/3_wed/news4wednesday.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090217142545/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june20/3_wed/news5wednesday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june20/3_wed/news5wednesday.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090217140943/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june27/3_wed/news5wednesday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/News2005/jun05/june27/3_wed/news5wednesday.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Home Front (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)