Talk:List of South Korean festivals

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

To do list edit

Each group members has responsible for few province of south korea. we already distributed own our preference.

According to this plan, each member will search festival which has been held in specific province on the secondary sources. After search and write down on the our pages, we will cross-check of every single points with our responsible. This process will help improve our page's quality and quantity also.

  • Region / Traffic :
  • Date(Schedule) :
  • History
  • Other similar Festival
  • Photo
  • Special Activity or Things you can do

This point is formal table for each festivals. All members has to follow that table and the contents of the table would be changed with group member sharing. (Are there any suggestions for that contents? Actually, we need more contents for information)

The overall plan looks reasonable, but you need to provide a list of references you will use. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think the overall plan looks good, but i think it's good for you to classify modern festivals according to theme, too. Tksgk262 (talk) 11:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think it is good way to categorize article according by genre of festival. edit

I think categorizing contents according by genre of festival in addition to geographycal standards is good way to make easy to see for other readers. For example, In Kyeongi-do, there are many kinds of festival. Cherry blossom festival in GwaCheon, book festival in Gunpo, air show festival in Ansan and so on. So, I suggest that caregorize article like

Kyeongi

Nature festival

  • Cherry blossom in Gwacheon
  • Everland tulip festival

Music festival

  • Jisan rock festival

Book festival

  • Book festival in Gunpo

I think it makes article look arraged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choi Hyun Hee (talkcontribs)

Appears to be good idea, Choi Hyun Hee, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 05:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC).Reply
I agree, it would be a welcome addition to the geographical scheme. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think this article has many contents. But this content`s explain is yet. So I think that subscribe about festival`s explain is more useful to this article. HaeYoon (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

This article is arranged clearly. I suggest your team add some four seasons categories about festivals. and This is minor suggestion. Present categories is so good. but i think 4 seasons information also is good. --Minzi Yuk (talk) 12:44, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree with this opinion. I think way to categorize is problem at all. So many sections are unnecessary. It'd be categorized about theme, season and so on. If edit that, It will be good.--JinsuRyu (talk) 16:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

to Modern Korean festivals edit

hollo i'm jeoung sae young in Group 1. your article Contents not linked. désactivated click....and I think "Contents list is a lot of volumes in same theme" but also it's advantage.--116.121.56.175 (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

to Modern Korean festivals edit

hollo i'm jeoung sae young in Group 1. your article Contents not linked. désactivated click....and I think "Contents list is a lot of volumes in same theme" but also it's advantage--Gotpdud (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I'm sehyun Oh. I think there are a lot of festival in South Korea so I suggest some festival for your article. Hampyeong butterfly festival in Jeonnam also Wikipedia in Korea has lots of Jeonnam festival. I think it helps your article.Dhtpgus90 (talk) 13:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations!!! "This article or section is in the process of an expansion or major restructuring." I bet you all are doing good job!! I think people thought this is a very interesting page. However, it would be much better if more contents were edited ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park (talkcontribs) 14:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion, it is better that Festivals are categorized by themes or types or month-to-month. Hyegyeong Yun (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

This article deal with many festivals in Korea:) edit

I am surprised at this article because of idea. In Korea, many festivals exist but information scatter so it is difficult to know information that I want. Thus, this article is very useful because it organize festival information by regional groups. I think that if there is each regional festival's explanation, this article is perfect!--Bohyunlee (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments on our group article edit

Firstly, I'm very pleased to hear everyone opinions and recommendations on our article. Our group members will discuss about further improvements on our project based on people suggestions. We promise we will present plentiful of high quality references to it! We will focus on building our article right after the mid-term exams. Finally, Thanks for everyone encouragement. Sang Kuk Son 18:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luvepoli (talkcontribs)

to Modern Korean festivals edit

Um... your group project is good but your group's article have one mistake. Look at References number 4. your group Reference have error. Please check and edit:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LEE JUNG HYUN (talkcontribs) 06:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks everyone who make a suggestion for our article. edit

I really appreciate to all our class-colleagues who make a comment to our article. They gave lots of useful tips and direction to us to navigate the desirable way. Most of all, divide into Month-to-Month is so useful to me when we re-range all contents when after almost all kinds of festival added.Byung do jung (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Instructor review edit

  • Lead: needs minor grammar cleanup, but is on topic and wikified. Please remove to-do and editorializing like "We will divide" and "It will help to peoples". See Wikipedia:Editorializing. WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:YOU.
  • Good job find a related and free picture, you will need more - but that's a good start.
  • The preeliminary layout for the list is good, through
  • More references are needed, and they need to be properly formatted. See Wikipedia:Citation templates which we covered few weeks ago - check our lecture Prezis for videos on how to use them. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
You haven't finished starting the peer review. You still need to chose category (arts), and fill in the request. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I am glad to see there is a lot of content, but don't forget about references! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

-- I have done some copy editing and cleanup; please accept changes as needed, or create an archive if there is a need to preserve a student or instructor copy. - Keneckert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keneckert (talkcontribs) 10:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of modern Korean festivals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply