Ragnarok (board game) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 January 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of SPI games. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why doesn't the List of SPI games have an article on SPI's Napoleon at Waterloo game? If I am remembering this rightly, it used to be handed out as a 'bonus' (or "freebie") game to new subscribers to the magazine Strategy and Tactics back in 1972 and 1973. Who designed it? Where can it be bought? (That is, in the real world, not internet.) Has it somehow fallen into the public domain? Is there a computer version of this venerable game? 216.99.219.197 (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
