Talk:List of QRP Transceivers

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mu301 in topic transwiki import

Untitled edit

This page shall serve as an overview on the current market situation of QRP transceivers. What order criteria (columns) did I miss? Would it make sense to link this table somehow to eham.net? 2A4Fh56OSA (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Could you please add a column for the year of manufacturing of the item? (the latest model for each item would be best). Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.144.78.58 (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of QRP Transceivers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

transwiki import edit

FYI: this page has been transwiki imported to en-wv at v:Draft:List of QRP Transceivers, should anyone want to develop it into a learning resource there. --mikeu talk 23:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply