Talk:List of Primeval books and novelisations
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Activity books
editI think the activity book articles should be deleted. Keep them listed here, but they are plotless and have no real need for a seperate article. ----- Cuddly Panda (talk · contribs) review me! |my chatroom] 08:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- It stays as it could contain information on the series, case in point; one of them will have an exclusive trading card game. We just have to wait until its published to find out the details. Now just go away troll, or at the very least descuss your ideas with me before you split any more pages as you are quickly becoming a plague on these pages and all you do is create a mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nubula (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Primeval books and novelisations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123055457/http://www.titanbooks.com/categories/uk/universe-112-Primeval/ to http://www.titanbooks.com/categories/uk/universe-112-Primeval/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)