Talk:List of NATLFED entities
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Whosasking in topic responded defensively?
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 May 27. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Cleaned up and referenced edit
I have added links to thirteen newspaper aritlces which name most of the groups in the list; references to Invest Yourself to support a few more, and a link to the anti-natlfed page for those that are mentioned nowhere else (and probably didn't do much, else they'd have been mentioned elsewhere.) I believe this suffices to cite the relevant sources. Whosasking 20:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
responded defensively? edit
Responded defensively to whom, and when? The characterization "defensive" is POV in itself, but applying it so vaguely is more so. Dybryd 00:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- You are right; "responded defensively" is inherently POV, and has no place in this article. Whosasking 17:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Is the neutrality of this article still under dispute? Whosasking 15:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)