Talk:List of Minnesota trees by family

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Start of Page:

Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir is reported on the NRCS page: NRCS: USDA Plants Profile:

Pseudotsuga menziesii, var glauca
- Minnesota Counties: [1]

From Michael,inYUMA,Az--Mmcannis 10:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hackberry

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm wondering what's the source used for the trees' taxonomic families- one that stuck out as odd to me was Celtis occidentalis inclusion in the Cannabacea family, I learned that it was in with the elms in Ulmacea. minnecologies (talk) 21:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic