Talk:List of Melbourne Cup placings

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Horse racing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of Melbourne Cup placings is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Article edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not sure whether this article is really necessary for Wikipedia. Most of this information can be found at List of Melbourne Cup winners and at the articles on individual Melbourne Cups. The list needs a lot of expansion, currently only consisting of this year's race, and the second list is really just a more detailed list of Melbourne Cup winners. Both links given require membership of the website to access, so I am unsure whether either of these support the information given. Bozzio (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

OK. I will concentrating on removing these offending links and provide alternate ones. As far as the list is concerned, the List of Melbourne Cup winners is inadequate to my mind. It gives hardly any detail. I attempted to expand that list, but was reverted. Rather than get into a useless firefight, I took this approach. It is very difficult to change some people's ideas on Wikipedia I find. Wallie (talk) 23:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Melbourne Cup placings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512082820/http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/melbournecup/ to http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/melbournecup/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic