Talk:List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Third Battle of Winchester

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Unititled edit

I created this list using a template from the Second Battle of Fort Fisher (which I had collaberated on). I am not sure how to edit the box that still shows "Second Battle of Fort Fisher" to "Battle of Opequon".

Randy Fletcher (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good job and done. I wonder if we should call this the Third Battle of Winchester rather than Battle of Opequon though since the former is the more commonly used name for the battle. --Kumioko (talk) 04:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Third Battle of Winchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply