Talk:List of LucasArts games

Incomplete list

edit

The list in its current form is far from complete. I'm not sure about the console titles, but at least the PC section omits completely LucasArts' WWII flight simulators, for instance. I updated it with the adventure game titles and some Star Wars titles that I noticed were missing, but the list needs to be scrutinised. Tagged with update for this reason. --Jopo 08:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Changed update tag to listdev tag, as it is more appropriate. :) --Jopo 08:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


There's a game called Star Wars: Racer Revenge, i added it to the list. Hope i could help. 70.170.93.169 00:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wrong terminology

edit

PC is too general term. It also means Macintosh which is a type of PC. Amiga is also PC, like Atari is PC. In this list PC should be divined with DOS and Windows categories. It would make more sense.

The proper name is IBM PC Compatible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.222.57.51 (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


What makes Sony playstation more console than computer with intel based x86 prosessor? Therefore I'm changing the article to utilize this. If you don't like it then revert it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.44.211.71 (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is a "List of LucasArts games by Platform"

edit

I don't like how the games are categorized within this list. This is more of a "List of LucasArts games by Platform" than a "List of LucasArts games". You can check the List of Sierra Entertainment video games article to see what a "List of LucasArts games" would be like: each game mentioned once, and the whole thing alphabetical and/or chronological. If people feel the urge to mention the platforms the games were released for, that information should be listed alongside the games (within parentheses or in a table column). --82.171.13.139 (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Listing it by platform is a waste of time. Most people who come here want to see it chronological. Crzyclarks (talk) 20:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have assorted all the contents as best I could into a table by Alphabetical order. Is that much better? Deltasim (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply