This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
"Code points in orange will be added in Unicode 5.1." This doesn't appear to have happened. If I understand the Unicode website correctly, the characters in question have been accepted for inclusion in some future version of Unicode. However, I don't think they were added to Unicode 5.1 which was just released. I'm not completely sure I'm right about this.Chris Johnson (talk) 20:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Corrected. Actually the quote you used above was just my estimation; I thought they would be added in Unicode 5.1 that time. However I'm pretty they will be added in the next version of Unicode since it is formally "accepted (stage 5 of ISO process)." -- (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it's been changed. Currently they're on stage 6. Now I can really 100 percent sure that they WILL be added in the next version of Unicode. -- (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I notice the links don't seem to make much sense at all - ᇞ, for example, just links to the page on Hangul without any sort of link to the section that mentions it, whereas ㅿ just links to the character tables (despite not being included there at all.)
Should we link to the Wiktionary article on them where such articles exist, or should we link to the "Letters" section of the Hangul article? Tymewalk (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
