Talk:List of British Rail Class 47 locomotives
 | List of British Rail Class 47 locomotives was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 March 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of British Rail Class 47 locomotives. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47701 edit
In 1992, 47701 carried the "Old Oak Common" name and had Network South East livery. See https://youtube.com/watch?v=sYq9YoxIU1k at 12m 55s onwards. - 79.74.138.230 (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Added to page. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Commons Links edit
I've put |<!--{{Commons category-icon|British Rail Class 47 Dxxxx (TOPS 47xxx, 47yyy)}}--> at the end of each entry. To convert this to a Commons link just replace the xs and ys and remove the comment tags. Extra identities need to be added as needed. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 14:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Order dates edit
Does the the order dates column serve any purpose here, it is more relevant to the main article British Rail Class 47. In service dates would be of more use if anyone knows of a reliable source. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- I've added a new section showing the different orders and deleted the column from the main table will helps makes things clearer to read.Murgatroyd49 (talk) 18:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Unofficial Names edit
My original webpage that was the genesis for this article used italics to show unofficial names. However over the years several editors have added official names in italics, as that is the convention on Wikipedia. To avoid further confusion I have tagged the unofficial names with <ref name=unofficial /> and will progressively italicise all the names. Hope that is acceptable. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 18:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)