This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Related taskforces:
/
This redirect is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 1 day ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I think this article should be merged into the authoring group, Center for Science in the Public Interest. There's evidence of a spate of news coverage and influence following its release, but I struggle to see how that warrants a white paper having its own article independent of the advocacy group that wrote it. WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 23:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
merge - agree it makes more sense and CSPI page is not so long that it warrants splitting off into separate article Superb Owl (talk) 06:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Merge. No indications of notability for a separate article. Daask (talk) 22:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
