Talk:Liouville–Neumann series
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 81.217.197.27 in topic Resolvent of what?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Should the third equation start with \phi_n rather than \phi? Otherwise there's a subscript n on the right side of the equation but not the left.
- Good catch! I went back to my source to double check, and I did indeed omit a subscript n there. Thanks for spotting the error. Bryan
In the last equation but one, should K_{n+1} be K_n? Also there should be definition K_0(x,z)=\delta(x-z)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:DE00:1:2218:9DA2:3D3:7FB1:CD86 (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes! Fixed. Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Resolvent of what? edit
The term resolvent refers to some operator. Yet, in the phrase "The resolvent (or solving kernel) is then given by ...." it is completely unclear which operator's resolvent is meant, at least to the common reader. Would be great if anyone could insert the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.217.197.27 (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)