Talk:Lion (color)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 2.245.234.161 in topic Merge into Desert Sand?
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
Merge into Desert Sand?
editSeeing as this is the same color as Desert Sand, should we merge this one along with Fallow and Camel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.59.183.188 (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'd support this merger--Slon02 (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Object - As I mentioned in the talk page on Camel (color), the ISCC-NBS color list on the Internet only provides a limited number of centroids (color samples), so colors that are actually different in printed sample books are incorrectly shown as being the same color. Therefore, if you want to merge this color, it should be merged into Variations of orange, and thus kept separate from the color Desert sand, which is in actuality a different color. Keraunos (talk) 23:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: There is a discussion being held here about whether to merge minor colors into articles on the physical objects that they represent or into color-list articles.--Slon02 (talk) 22:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Is "Lion (color)" even notable? bobrayner (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Object - If it's not notable, you should delete most of Wikipedia's articles. Just because you feel that something looks the same, doesn't mean it's really the same. --2.245.234.161 (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)