Talk:Linyphiidae

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

untitled

edit
potatoes   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.16.109 (talk) 14:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply 

The Bowl and Doily spiders are small (about 4 mm. or 2/10 inch) creatures that weave a fairly complex sheet web system consisting of an inverted dome shaped web ("bowl") suspended above a horizontal sheet web ("doily"). They are members of the Lynphiinae, and their formal name is Frontinella pyramitela.

I've copied the above text here from Bowl and doily spider, since I don't know enough about this to encorporate it (does it apply to all, or only some spiders?). I have added the photos. Mark Richards 20:37, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Better not. Especially if you don't know enough. Mikkalai 20:44, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

For the future, please keep in mind that there is no such thing as "Bowl and doily and dwarf spider", but there are "Bowl and doily and dwarf spiders", jusr as there is no noun "scissor" (there is a "to scissor" verb). This is a common mistake of dictionary compilers to back-derive a singular from a plural. Mikkalai 21:20, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

This case was an especially tricky one: bowl-and-doily...and dwarf.Mikkalai 22:05, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

sheetweb spider: same or different family?http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biodiversity/invertebratesprog/invertid/bug_details.asp?Bu_Id=57 Mikkalai 21:40, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)~

Are we sure about the money spider thing?

edit

i always heard that if you throw it over your shoulder you have monetary luck, could somone cite a reference for whats written as my grandma doesent really count for mine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.16.145 (talk) 10:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everything about this comment is gold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VarikValefor (talkcontribs) 05:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.andtan.newmail.ru/list/
    Triggered by \bnewmail\.ru\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

blacklisting bot

edit

I don't have time for this garbage. I followed the link to indicate that the remote URL doesn't seem to be problematical. The place I arrived at indicated that I might need to go someplace else. Stupid and annowing.P0M (talk) 05:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Map update

edit

The map seems to indicate that Linyphiidae is not found on Svalbard, but various sources on the internet indicate that there are many representatives on Svalbard. Ordinary Person (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Including, for instance, Lepthyphantes sobrius .Ordinary Person (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linyphiidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linyphiidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply