Talk:Linkage institution

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Linkage institution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Tone of "Development" Section

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The tone of the section titled "Development" does not seem encyclopedic. It also does not do much to describe linkage institutions. I am not very experienced editing Wikipedia pages, so I do not feel comfortable making direct changes to the article. I think the section should be flagged for tone, but I do not know how to do that. Can someone flag or edit the section?

Mfein10 (talk) 22:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic