Talk:Link Trainer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Comments

edit

is it called the crab, or is it a turtle?

i've always heard these devices called turtles but cant seem to find a reference.--Ryan the leach (talk) 08:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply



In the israeli airforce museum in be'er-sheva is a old link trainer on display! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.81.36.77 (talk) 11:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Referencing and citation

edit

The Referencing and citation in the box says "not met", but the article appears to meet all the criteria to me 66.87.2.54 (talk) 18:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Link Trainer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

It is important to note that there were multiple types of "Link Trainer". The article currently claims that the "Pilot Maker" was the first version. During World War II alone, there are at least Link C.3, D.2, D.4, and ANT-18 variants - which all appear to be versions of the same base model. (For instance, the ANT-18 is referred to as being "upgraded" from the C.3 by the ASME report.)

It is also worthwhile to note that the format of the designation is unclear as well - with some sources having the letter and number being separated by a period, others by a hyphen, and others still nothing at all. This difference seems to correlate somewhat to whether the model was used in Commonwealth countries, which are more likely to use a period, or American service, which seems to prefer the hyphen. Furthermore, it appears that there are other designation systems for the trainers with a "1-XX-1" apparently being used by the U.S. Military, as well as a reference to a "Model X" layout. For example; as noted in the previous link; the designations 1-CA-1, Model F, and C-8 all refer to the same variant.

Postwar, the Link Company designed new models of trainer such as the GAT-1, GAT-2, GAT-3, C.8, and C.11B. There is also a "Jitterbug, Jr." from an unknown period.

My point by stating all of this is to suggest that maybe the article needs to be split. I would suggest something along these lines: a Link Aviation Devices for the company itself, a Link C.3 Trainer (or other more base variant) for the World War II version, a Link GAT Trainer for that portion of the postwar series, and a List of surviving Link Trainers (along the lines of the dedicated aircraft survivor articles) for all extant examples if a list of them meets WP:Notability criteria. However, this may result in each becoming a stub for lack of information. At the very least, a better clarification between versions needs to be made in the current article. –Noha307 (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Link Trainer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Link Trainer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Link Trainer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply