Talk:Linear relation
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Syzygy was copied or moved into Syzygy (mathematics) with this edit on 1 May 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
About the Title edit
It seems to me that "Syzygy (mathematics)" is a better title for this page. Mojtabakd «talk» 07:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree. AFAIK, the common use is "linear relation" for individual relations, and "syzygy" is used almost only for the module of all the linear relations, and for relations between relations (2d syzygies). Moreover, for most readers, the current title explains clearly the subject of the article, while "syzygy" is meaningless. Also, it is always better to have a title without disambiguating parentheses, as this allows linking without piping. D.Lazard (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
"Stably isomorphic" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Stably isomorphic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 8#Stably isomorphic until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 01:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible error in the history section? edit
I was curious to know if Cayley explicitly cited astronomy when introducing the term to math, so I looked up Cayley's collected works, and a search for the character string "syz" had only one match. It was the term "syzygetic," and it appeared in the title of a paper by Sylvester that Cayley cited. Does anyone want to take the next step and try to dig up that paper?
-- Greg at Higher Math Help (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)