Talk:Line representations in robotics
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Attention needed
edit- Expand
- Clarify definitions and applications in robotics
- Examples ?
Chaosdruid (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Product of exponentials?Vannevarmorgan (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 30 August 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Robotics conventions → Line representations in robotics – This article seems to be all about line representations and not as general as the title implies. Maybe rename to "Line representations in robotics"? RJFJR (talk) 00:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: First relist. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Robotics has been notified of this discussion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
I approve of giving it this more specific name, but the article itself could use some better explanation, too. What is a "line representation" in robotics? Is this a line drawn on paper or imagined in space that a robot follows? Why is this important? - Brian Kendig (talk) 00:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support some move away from the current title, which could be misinterpreted as referring to conferences about robotics. I don't have enough familiarity with the field to suggest a good title (or evaluate whether the proposed title is suitable) but the closer should still pick something per WP:NOGOODOPTIONS. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as proposed, since that's a concise description of the article's current contents, weak as it is. Dicklyon (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)