Merge suggestion edit
The articles should be
- (a) merged
- (b) computer art split off into an article separate from thraditional line art. `'mikka (t) 07:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
As "line art" is not a proper name, I think it would be more appropriate to merge Line Art into Line art. Jobarts-Talk 07:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Agree that article should be merged into 'line art'. Example: Folk art and Graphic design. I'll also do some cleanup on Line Art too. Clubmarx 20:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- I did a rewrite to cleanup this and to incorporate the other Line art page.
- I moved examples of line art to the second section, leaving the first section for the definition. Took away POV text – like use of 'perversity.' Both versions state line art doesn't have to be monochromatic, so that point is maintained.
- In the second section, there was a lot of description of the general methods. I took a lot away, but I think they didn't directly related to this subject. They seem more appropriate within the page about the full subject not here. I limited it to just how that technique relates to the immediate subject, line art. For example, the etching section was just about etching, without mentioning line art.
- So, these still need to be merged. I left the capitalization as is, but I think this should be the main article, but just under 'Line art'. Clubmarx 21:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC)