| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lindsay Sandiford article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Rename article edit
Just wondering if this should be "Lindsay Sandiford case" rather than "Lindsay Sandiford" as there are others involved in the case and it's not really a biography. Any thoughts? Paul MacDermott (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps that is for the best. As she is notable for this case and really not for anything else. However the article should stay as it is and not be rewritten, I find the article to be focusing on the Lindsay Sandiford case and not Lindsay Sandifords life as it is already. Good work.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- On first thought I agree with renaming, but on second thought, I think it's best to leave it as it is. Lee Harvey Oswald for example is there as an entry with some minimal biographical detail - sufficient to give context, just as there is with Sandiford - but the rest of the piece focuses on what he is known for. I say leave it the way it is.Cross Reference (talk) 13:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lindsay Sandiford case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/Death-sentence-Cheltenham-grandmother-Lindsay/story-17937172-detail/story.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130318175415/http://www.timesofoman.com/News/Article-10999.aspx to http://www.timesofoman.com/News/Article-10999.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/Lindsay-Sandiford-awaits-execution-ask-death/story-18057828-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)