Talk:Lindsay Lohan/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

The Lohan Censorship

Alright I know this has been mentioned a few times in other discussion topics but I really think we need it as a topic itself. What's the deal with censoring this page to hide the rehab the cocaine, etc. There's video of her doing cocaine and multiple friends accounts. She's been in rehab twice now. Who is it on here that keeps trying to hide everything cause this isn't minor stuff that's irrelevent, and I'm sick of seeing that someone keeps trying to make her seem as though she's some amazing actress rising to the top. Of all the stuff that's going on, the only thing that's shown is:

"Lohan's three car accidents in 2005 made headlines. The first was a minor rear-ender, though the victims later threatened to sue her.[41] She suffered minor injuries when a paparazzo who was following her for a photograph hit her car (police called the crash intentional, but prosecutors said there was not enough evidence to file criminal charges).[42] Lohan also struck a van in West Hollywood; police ruled that the van's driver made an illegal U-turn.[43] When VH1 named Lohan "Big 'It' Girl" for its 'Big' in '05 Awards in December, it was, Lohan quipped, "because being Big in '05 means getting in three car crashes in one year, people!".[44]. Lohan was involved in an accident again on May 26, 2007, during which the Beverly Hills Police Department arrested her and issued a summons for driving under the influence. The police discovered a "usable" quantity of a substance tentatively identified to be cocaine at the scene.[45]"

and that's mostly about the old car accidents! The truth has got to come out already.

Please see WP:BLP, WP:CITE, and WP:RS. If you can find information that meets all of these criteria and is notable (as would almost certainly be the case for at least most of these), it can be added. --Yamla 16:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I would rewrite it, but let's face it. There's a history of such material getting deleted, so I won't waste my time. The couple of people who keep deleting this information should write it or restore the old one, not ask others to do so when there has already been well-researched material written (see the old example above). 68.43.1.171 06:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Sean 5 June 07

Her second stint in rehab now has been documented everywhere....please someone cite a source and put it into the article. People might think Lohan gets special treatment when she shouldn't be. Spears, Richie and Hilton certainly don't when it comes to their articles.

THIS PAGE NEEDS A TIME OUT!

Apparently, Wikipedia has be bought by Fox, as aparent from the sanitization of this article.68.152.95.130 17:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

This conversation needs to end actually. Jmlk17 04:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

As I recall from the FAC, there are a couple editors who apparently revere Lindsay as some kind of goddess and have historically refused to add anything negative, whether it be her accidental genitalia flash, drunk driving incidents, spat with other celebrities, work habits, or in this case, the arrest. Now that she's going to officially go to jail for at least one of these charges, perhaps the chokehold these weirdos have held on the article will finally be relented. It's almost as bad as Furry, in which the criticism section has been consistently censored or removed. Zeality 22:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Are Lohan's Publicists Sanitizing This Article?

It sure seems that way!

Doubt it :). Jmlk17 04:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

PUBLIC REQUESTS THAT THIS ARTICLE BE UNLOCKED

The censorship of this public forum needs to end. Many people have put their time and energies into documenting solid facts of Cocaine abuse, drunk driving, alcohol abuse and other activities that while unflattering still merit listing within this article.

Please consider this the public request to have the article unlocked. Subsequent requests will go to reviewing board, with request to review Strothra and RadioKirks wiki admin privileges to see if they should be allowed to keep a mop & bucket if they cannot be trusted to adhere to the very founding pillars of wiki (POV, etc).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.156.223 (talk • contribs)

We are not admins. If you wish to edit the article then please register. --Strothra 13:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Additionally, please see WP:RFPP. However, you'll want to have read WP:BLP first; unless a claim of cocaine abuse meets the requirements outlined there, it must not be added to this page. So far, no sufficient source has been found. --Yamla 14:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

A reliable source? How about these sources of Lohan's public record detailing her abuse of alcohol, drunk driving, and cocaine use: http://www.nypost.com/seven/06282007/entertainment/cops_release_lindsay_s_toxicology_report_entertainment_david_k_li.htm http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20044068,00.html http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/28/lohan-allegedly-coked-up-during-car-crash/ http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=275879 http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/articles/0628lohan0628report-CR.html http://www.eonline.com/gossip/hum/detail/index.jsp?uuid=700bd278-3a9b-4cd9-8aba-4dd22770e261 http://film.guardian.co.uk/apnews/story/0,,-6736957,00.html

This is all highly relevant information (do we next filter the drug use out of the bios for Jimmy Hendrix, Elvis, Anna Nicole, and others?) this is a public forum and subject NEUTRALITY must be observed on every issue or else wikipedia denegrates into nothing more than a 2nd rate MySpace forum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boatswain1533 (talk • contribs)

Please note that Wikipedia is not a public forum - it is an encyclopedia. Further, there are guidelines and rules regarding biographies of living people, undue weight, and notability. Edits must conform to policies in both letter and spirit. Wikipedia is not a tabloid - please see WP:NOT. The content of an article focused on an individual must contribute to explaining the subject's notability. Thus, the content of the article must be weighted in light of the reasons for such notability. For instance, Lohan's notability comes primarily from her singing and film career. All other things, including criminal records, occurred subsequently to that primary notability and therefore get less attention. BLP policies cause us to err on the side of caution and veer away from issues that are controversial particularly when the subject's primary notability is not a result of those issues. --Strothra 22:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Have to disagree with you on that last point. It's clear to most people she's just as famous right now for getting into trouble as she is for her singing and movie career. Just my two cents. 143.166.226.40 (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The ridiculous censoring of her unprofessionalism on set.

I came here to browse Lindsay Lohan's page for fun and come to find out virtually nothing negative is said about her. It's amazing because she has had a lot of negative actions worth mentioning. This isn't a eulogy or something, people come to wikipedia for reliable information. Painting her in a positive light despite the shady things she has done helps nobody. I at least expected to read about the backlash her unpofessionalism on set recieved her. The scathing comments by cast members and studio heads. I have all the sources ready, all I need is the go ahead to write it. For the past 4 years I have been studying journalism so I am confident I can write a non-biased section on these issues. What needs to be done to get the block on her page removed?

The Santa Monica Police Dept. has an official mug shot taken on July 24, 2007. One of the official charges on that date is bring a controlled substance (cocaine) into a jail facility.

Lott444 16:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Lott444

Welcome to Wikipedia! If you click the small padlock image on the top right of the article you will be taken to Wikipedia:Protection_policy where you can read more about what you can do. Essentially this article is semi-protected so you will need to be registered for five days before you can edit it. I strongly recommend you do stick around and edit the article if you have good sources and are willing to contribute good unbiased edits --PTSE 16:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

"Media Spotlight"?

Why are her repeated criminal offenses discussed under a section called 'media spotlight'? In almost every other article this kind of information goes under 'personal life.' 75.56.142.106 16:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll change it.--Tom 17:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

removing link to SCRAM bracelet product page

I thought about providing such a link too - since it's otherwise not clear what the attorney is talking about. But the External Links page does say that "links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services" should normally be avoided. Ribonucleic 19:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

How about this one: [1] Terry Carroll 19:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Or one of these: [2], [3]. Terry Carroll 19:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[4] looks good. Thanks for the find. Ribonucleic 19:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Done. Terry Carroll 19:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

"Mean Girl" photo

Isn't that promotional photo actually for Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.61.46.145 (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC).

No it's not, the Mean Girls pictures all had that lighting and makeup, just google it and you'll find it. Besides in Confessions she had lighter hair.—Preceding unsigned comment added by AtTheGatesOfBodom (talk • contribs)

Note, found a new and better photo then the one being used. Experienced issues putting it on and now it is a glorified mess. If anyone can help fix this it would be greatly appreciated.

Cocaine

What about Lohan's recently released toxicology? (as reported here, among other places: http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/28/lohan-allegedly-coked-up-during-car-crash)

Will there be a mention of the recent photos of Lohan taking cocaine? [5]DrugsRBadMkay 00:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

There was a mention of the story, but it was sourced to a tabloid and did not include any pictures so I removed it. If you can find a credible source, by all means add it back in. We just need to be careful since this is a living person bio. Dchall1 01:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Here's a site with pictures - http://thesuperficial.com/2007/05/lindsay_lohan_caught_snorting.php - I don't wanna edit the page on her, just letting someone who does want to know.{{Subst:unsigned|155.143.116.228}

Under the founding principle of wikipedia, subject neutrality, the widely documented uses of narcotics and alcohol abuses by this actress should be included in her bio. Along with the above link as proof, here are addition reputable sources of Lohan's public record detailing her abuse of alcohol, drunk driving, and cocaine use: http://www.nypost.com/seven/06282007/entertainment/cops_release_lindsay_s_toxicology_report_entertainment_david_k_li.htm http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20044068,00.html http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/28/lohan-allegedly-coked-up-during-car-crash/ http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=275879 http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/articles/0628lohan0628report-CR.html http://www.eonline.com/gossip/hum/detail/index.jsp?uuid=700bd278-3a9b-4cd9-8aba-4dd22770e261 http://film.guardian.co.uk/apnews/story/0,,-6736957,00.html

Although I usually tolerate RadioKirk's apparent infatuation with Lindsey and do not comment the exclusion of this highly relevant information (do we next filter the drug use out of the bios for Jimmy Hendrix, Elvis, Anna Nicole, and others?) this is a public forum and subject NEUTRALITY must be observed on every issue or else wikipedia denegrates into nothing more than a 2nd rate MySpace forum.

ERRONEOUS INFORMATION IN RECENT ARREST CONTENT

 The recent arrest info stated in the Wiki - A field sobriety test was conducted and she was subsequently arrested for DUI.     

This is INCORRECT. It should read "She refused a sobriety test at the scene but was tested at the station according to Lt. Alex Padilla of the Santa Monica Police. The test found her blood alcohol between .12 and .13, he also said." article support from LA Times - http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-ex-lohan24jul24,0,2835298.story?coll=la-home-localDalisair 20:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

The following is an exact copy of the official Press Release issued on July 24, 2007 by the Santa Monica Police Dept.:

On Tuesday, July 24, 2007, at 1:35 AM, the Santa Monica Police Department received a call of two vehicles chasing each other in the area of Main Street and Pico Boulevard. Officers responded to the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium parking lot located at 1855 Main Street and upon arrival spoke with the drivers of two vehicles. The vehicle that was being chased was a 2007 black Cadillac Escalade and was being driven by the mother of Lindsay Lohan’s personal assistant. The other vehicle was a 2004 white GMC Yukon and was being driven by Lindsay Lohan.

While conducting a preliminary investigation at the scene, officers smelled alcohol on Lindsay Lohan’s breath. Lohan failed a field sobriety exam administered by the officers. Lohan was given the opportunity to take a Preliminary Alcohol Screening (PAS) test at the scene but refused. Lohan was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and was transported to the Santa Monica Jail. While in the jail an alcohol breath test was administered to Lohan. The results of the alcohol breath test were .12% and .13%, which is above the California legal limit of .08%. During the booking process, officer’s found a small amount of cocaine in Lohan’s pocket.

Lohan was booked at the Santa Monica jail for driving under the influence, possession of a controlled substance and for driving with a suspended/revoked driver’s license. At 6:20 A. M. Lohan’s attorney arrived at the Santa Monica Police Department and posted $25,000 bail. Lohan was released on bail.

The text presently reads:

In the pre-dawn hours of 24 July 2007, the Santa Monica police received a 911 call from a car being driven by Michelle Peck - whose daughter, Tarin Graham, several hours previously, left her employment as Lohan's personal assistant. Peck reported that she was being chased by a white GMC and feared for her safety.[64] The police later found Peck and Lohan having a "heated debate" in the parking lot of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Lohan refused to take a breathalyzer test, but agreed to other field sobriety tests. After failing these tests, she was taken to a police station where her blood alcohol level was tested at between 0.12 and 0.13 percent - above the California legal limit of 0.08 percent.

Car driven by Peck. Lohan gets a sobriety test. (For being a passenger?) There's a legal limit of 0.08 in California for engaging in "heated debate"? Whatever the truth, conceptual continuity in this passage sucks. If the law reads "legal limit for operating a motor vehicle" law enforcement might choose to establish her sobriety at the scene in advance of determining her status as operating a motor vehicle (in that condition or worse), but failing to do that in due process, Lohan would no longer be over any legal limit I'm aware of (general public intoxication?) As a side note, in the jurisdiction where I live--during the 1980s at least--it was required to prove DWI that the police obtain two readings over the legal limit with the second reading lower than the first reading, otherwise it was possible for the defense to argue that the blood alcohol level while driving had remained below the legal limit because the alcohol was still in the stomach and had not yet entered the blood stream. As presently written, this passage seems to imply that the standard has fallen to the level of having alcohol on your breath near a vehicle recently operated is all that it takes to violate the "legal limit". MaxEnt 05:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

reverting Strothra's deletion

The significant amount of material deleted by this editor was, in my opinion: A) properly sourced, B) neutrally presented, and C) proportional to both the subject's current notability in general and the 2007 biography section in particular. As such, I am reverting the deletion. If they believe that other sections of the article are being overshadowed by this material, it would be more appropriate for them to contribute to those sections - rather than remove the work of others. Ribonucleic 22:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Who is covering up the fact theres a clear video of her snorting coke and the fact she has been yelled at by studio execs for being late and hung over while on the set as well as being fired. The main article is either being edited by her yes man team/managers/publicists or someone living their life through hers

Suicide?

Is this just shameless vandalism? Where is the source? ... Something tells me it could be real? I'm not sure. If so, I'm a little heartbroken, I have advance screening passes to her new movie X_X 68.30.114.31 07:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC) July 26th, 3:46 a.m.

Well then, the vandalism continues to only a single sentence on a page. Admins/mods help!

Well now, the URL goes back to LL's page ... what in the world is going on with this suicide story ?

If there was even a remote possibility of it being true, TMZ.com would have already put up 7 posts about it. :-) As of 11:23 AM Eastern Time, nothing. Whatever the young lady's problems are, being dead is not currently one of them. Ribonucleic 15:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Donata "Dina" Sullivan Lohan: Rockette?

If there are no credible citations attesting to her Rockette job, shouldn't this be removed?Rosiestephenson 20:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

That, ah, "unsubstantiated" claim from White Oprah tells me a lot about her - and, by extension, the subject of the article. I'd vote to keep it in. Ribonucleic 21:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

'''It was confirmed by the Rockette company that she was never a Rockette.''' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.250.193.202 (talk) 03:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

New York Futures Traders: private company vs. misnamed organization?

I haven't been able to find a company or organization called "New York Futures Traders". Is this a private business, hence no internet presence? Or was Michael Lohan president of "New York Mercantile Exchange", which trades futures? Or is there another cited explanation about what "New York Futures Traders" is?Rosiestephenson 20:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Jay Leno

She was suppose to be on his show on the day of her arrest. Should that fact be added?--97.84.1.91 03:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I would vote 'No'. It doesn't seem necessary to add that fact.Doktor Waterhouse 13:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Fake email

How soon till we find out that she never sent that email? Anyways, --Tom 14:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I tried to tweek that sentence. Sorry for being a skeptic, but I don't believe a thing on the WWW :). --Tom 14:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

The assistant and her mother

According to this http://www.mirror.co.uk/showbiz/2007/07/27/lohan-on-tail-of-star-therapist-89520-19528749/ the assistant is named Tarin Graham, and her mother is respected beautician Michelle Peck. Could someone insert those names, to make the story a bit hard to follow? It also explains the reference to Tarin in the e-mail quoted at the end.

Done. Good suggestion.Ribonucleic 23:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Kabbalah banner

The subject is listed in the List of celebrities involved in the Kabbalah Centre. On that basis, the banner was added. Also, it was rated as "B" because, actually, assessments are regarding the relative completeness of the article, and having nothing to do with, as it were, whether any particular group or project thinks "their" content is included. The article has received a "B-Class" rating from the Biography project already; I also reviewed it and saw that, with the possible exception of "breaking stories", it does seem to be largely complete, which is the criteria for "B-Class" status. I actually am rather less invovled in the developing the content of the Kabbalah project than others right now, so I may not be working on the article myself anytime soon unless specifically requested to do so. However, I do know that the project will at least consider posting bios relevant to the project on the Portal:Kabbalah, and it is included in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Kabbalah/watchlist, where members can monitor it for vandalism and other changes. Also, I note that Kabbalah has several rather unusual symbols which may, perhaps, appear on something related to the individual. The members of that project would probably be the best ones to explain such a symbol, were it to figure into the biography in some way. John Carter 16:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

If lohan is involved with kabbalah the sources are pretty slim. I found this [6]

"While some fads come and go, this trend just keeps growing. In fact, just last week, teen sensation Lindsay Lohan was spotted wearing her red string."

Being seen once with a red string is far from being a Kabbalah Centre regular. I have not been able to find anything more substantial. Jon513 18:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Gotta agree with you about the red string. Half the kids at the local school wear them too, and I am certain only a tiny fraction of them are Kabbalah believers. Risker 23:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I've requested that the other members of the Kabbalah project find specific sources indicating that all those individuals included on their list of celebrities associated with the Kabbalah Centre be individually referenced and that related content be added to the articles on the individuals to substantiate their connection. I'm not sure how quickly that's going to be done, though. John Carter 14:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

July 24, 2007 arrest

Why is there no mention of the allegations that she hijacked the car with the two guys in it, running over the third guy's foot in the process? Ophois 22:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Maybe because we don't have a reliable source for the allegations? Or, if we do have said sources, because no-one's gotten around to putting it into the article? Tabercil 23:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, don't get an attitude. It's been nearly a month since the incident, and I was merely asking why half of the reported incident wasn't included in the article. A quick google search found these articles: (http://www.zap2it.com/movies/news/zap-lindsaylohancarcommandeer911,0,2305688.story) (http://www.tmz.com/2007/07/27/lindsay-i-wasnt-driving-the-black-kid-was/96) (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0707/27/ng.01.html) (http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070728/cm_huffpost/058206) Ophois 02:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Aug 24, 2007 Information is Incorrect

The article on Lindsay Lohan states that on Aug. 24, 2007: "She was charged with 1 Day in Jail etc." It should read: "On Aug. 24, 2007, she was sentenced to one day in jail etc." How can you charge someone with 1 day in jail?204.80.61.110 19:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Bennett Turk

Study in Europe? I don't think so

This article makes it sound as though Lohan is definitely going to study in Europe, but if you check the source, it comes from a single quote her mother tossed off at a PR event. Her mother is not at all a reliable source (she's been claiming for two years that she herself is on the verge of getting her own television show, for example). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.198.236.246 (talk) 18:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

DINA

Should be on a different page like Michael I wrote a page on Dina Lohan, so don't worry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.72.98.45 (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

This article is rediculosly bias

I can not find one negative thing about her. POV violations everything.Patcat88 (talk) 10:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

2004-2005 auto accidents in "Personal life" section

I reviewed the citations yesterday for the three 2005 auto accidents, wanting to better define them with Month/Year/Location data on each. The first citation's link worked, but the article, written in 2005, stated accident#1 occurred in 2004, so I made the appropriate copyedit. The citation links for accident#2 and accident#3 don't work anymore. I'll do some research later on, but if someone already has Month/Year/Location info, please make the copyedit to include citations. Thank you. Rosiestephenson (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment Besides the 2004 accident, I found citations for an October 2005 car accident, and a November 2006 car accident. I've updated the article with the dates/locations. I wasn't able to find info on other 2004-2006 car accidents. Rosiestephenson (talk) 00:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Gossip about Lindsay Lohan and sex addiction

• The reference source provided with the intention of adding information to this article is pure unmitigated gossip. Her former lover is not an expert on sex addiction and is not qualified to diagnose her. As well, the remainder of his screed is unverified and unverifiable. I have deleted the link, changed the name of this thread, and removed other commentary in accordance with WP:BLP Section 3.2. Risker (talk) 15:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Adding an external link with most recent and updated news about Lindsay Lohan

[spam link deleted]

This sites gathers from various sources all the recent about Lindsay Lohan. In my opinion it would be cool to have a link that points to such a resource —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damirsecki (talk • contribs) 01:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

It's an internet tabloid. It doesn't indicate where it gets it's information. It is inappropriate, per WP:EL. Do not add it as an external link or use it as a source. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. Ward3001 (talk) 02:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Please look my answer to you in the britney spear's article. I am of strong opinion the link should stay. Damirsecki —Preceding comment was added at 08:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The Brandon Davis Scandal

Upon reinstatement of this article, the famous downfall of their relationship, culminating in his public tirade in which the word "firecrotch" was introduced into the public lexicon, must be documented. Film magazine Empire rated the incident in its Top 50 events of 2007, songs have been written about the topic, and it was an eerie foreshadowing to the break-up and subsequent breakdown of Britney Spears and Kevin Federline. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.9.209.2 (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Lindsay As Marilyn (Caution: Nudity)

You may want to include this in the main article:

Topless Lindsay As Marilyn: http://media.nymag.com/fashion/08/lindsay-as-marilyn/index.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.33.196 (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

How, exactly, are you proposing that this information should be included? I don't see the point in posting nude photos (and unattractive at that) of Lohan in the article. Ward3001 (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Activism section

Since that section consists of nothing but Lindsay's run-in with PETA last year, it should be added that PETA was not impressed with her repudiation of fur last year, and has once again put her on its 'worst dressed list' (February 2008) 75.58.187.236 (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Source, please. With a complete citation. Ward3001 (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:A Little More Personal (Raw) album cover.jpg

Image:A Little More Personal (Raw) album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Lindsay Lohan Third Untitled Album

hi please put in this information in Lindsay Lohan Thir Untitled Album she states that her album is a Dance, Hip Hop and R&B album her is my source [[7]] and that she wants it to be like Kylie Minogue-meets-Rihanna a dance sound source [[8]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dom10194iscool (talk • contribs) 11:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)