Talk:Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Europe

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Confusion edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is a totally pointless confusion between geology and human (pre)history in too many en.wiki articles, including here. Together with the use of the ambiguous "BP" indication, which might still go in geology because of the far back processes, but never in human history, because for these limited guys we live today in the year 72 after "BP" in the sense of radiocarbon dating, or in the year 20 after BP in the sense of many sloppy geologists.2A02:8108:9640:1A68:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71 (talk) 12:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I would not have used BP because the difference between it and number of years ago is irrelevant with a figure like 42,000, but it is linked as [[Before present|BP]] to show the sense it is used in. Dudley Miles (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic