This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 7. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As I said before on the Rachel Entwistle talk page, I disagree with the deletion of the pages. The Neil Entwistle case is getting very serious. ABC, CNN, People Magazine (front cover of this week's magazine), BBC and quite possibly other media are getting interested in this mystery case. If it's notable enough to them, then it's notable enough for Wikipedia. Fanficgurl 1:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
I've just properly formatted the dates of birth and death, and got rid of unnecessary blank lines, but all three articles about the Entwistles ought to be merged into one article (if any are kept, it's sad ut not unfortunately particularly unusual) when all the legal processes have finished. It's all very sad, but really I must doubt that this article can say very much - what can be said about an 8-month old child that can't be said about virtually any child? I'm also doubtful that any child so young would be able to recite the Lords' Prayer at her christening. -- Arwel (talk) 14:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
