Talk:Lifesong/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 04:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• No information in body of article to support that the album was released on August 30, 2005
  • Added the info. Toa Nidhiki05 18:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Lead

• No issues

Background and recording

• No issues

Composition

• No issues

Critical reception and accolades

• No issues

Release and promotion

• No issues

Track listing

• No issues

Credits and personnel

• Credits lifted from the album liner notes of Lifesong.[7] → "Lifesong" does not need to bolded
  • Done. Toa Nidhiki05 18:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Charts and certifications

• No issues

References

• No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these issues and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

All issues have been addressed, so I passed the article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)