Talk:Lifesong/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 04:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- No information in body of article to support that the album was released on August 30, 2005
- Added the info. Toa Nidhiki05 18:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Lead
edit- No issues
Background and recording
edit- No issues
Composition
edit- No issues
Critical reception and accolades
edit- No issues
Release and promotion
edit- No issues
Track listing
edit- No issues
Credits and personnel
edit- Credits lifted from the album liner notes of Lifesong.[7] → "Lifesong" does not need to bolded
Charts and certifications
edit- No issues
References
edit- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these issues and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- All issues have been addressed, so I passed the article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)