This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This article should not be Titled "Life in 2050" it should be titled "Ulrich Eberl's book about Life in 2050" because that is all that is in this article. An article titled "Life in 2050" should contain material from many books and articles, from many Futurologists, not just one book. Although I could write that article, I just don't have the spare time! Sirswindon (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nonsense. If there were an article about "Life in 2050", we wouldn't call it that, and the book is titled Life in 2050, so that's what we should call the article. If there is another book titled Life in 2050, we might disambiguate to Life in 2050 (Eberl) and Life in 2050 (other author). — Arthur Rubin(talk) 01:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
It is not Nonsense. I searched Wikipedia for what is available for the future in the year 2050, and what did I get but a book. If what you are telling me is that I or anyone can put an article about a book (as in this case) and it will appear as a WIKIPEDIA Article? Then I can add millions of book titles with short articles onto WIKIPEDIA. THAT WOULD REALLY RESULT IN NONSENSE! Shouldn't this article be titled: Life in 2050 (Book Title)Sirswindon (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
