Talk:Life imitating art

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics
	Modern philosophy

Speed? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

~~If this isn't substanitally the same article that just got deleted, my apologies. --Joe Decker (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)~~ Nevermind. --Joe Decker (talk) 19:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

formulations before Wilde edit

Although Wilde's formulation is the most well-known, Robert Louis Stevenson in his earlier 1875 essay 'An Autumn Effect' after comparing a landscape to Japanese and French painting, writes, 'it is rather in nature that we see resemblances to art, than in art to nature; and we say a hundred times, "How like a picture!" for once that we say, "How like the truth!" The forms in which we learn to think of landscape are forms that we have got from painted canvas. Any man can see and understand a picture; it is reserved for the few to separate anything out of the confusion of nature, and see that distinctly and with intelligence.' (Richard Dury)

Add topic