Talk:Liceo classico
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Liceo classico from it.wikipedia. |
?
editprobably also in germqany there is something like it, where ancient languages are compulsory, but i'm not sure :P
- yer there is in germany, french, in usa itself. It's strange that the name of wikipedia's article is in italian 2liceo classio".."maturità classica".. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.104.58.113 (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
May I point out (and it's also in the Corsi Sperimentali section of the Italian wikipedia article) that the "normalised" course of liceo classico doesn't have Foreign Languages taught in the last three years? We got four hours per week in ginnasio and stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.36.161.148 (talk) 15:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC) True, I'm going to change it. Spree85
Access to universities
edit"Until 1968, this was the only secondary education track that allowed a student access to an Italian university". Uncorrect. Should be changed into "Until 1968, this was the only secondary education track that allowed a student access to all kind of Italian university". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.15.249.163 (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Lack of information
editI suggest the experimental liceo classico section be implemented. The table alone isn't enough. I'd do it but I lack the necessary information and I could be biased, being a student in a liceo scientifico (you know, the competition and everything). --Angelikfire (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note that after the latest 2010 school reform the experimental curricula are being phased out. It could still be useful to have a section on that for historical reasons. Jean (t·c) 15:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
ILLITERATE ARTICLE
editThe article is so badly written that at times it is meaningless. Someone who understands the subject should undertake a rewrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.154.93 (talk) 10:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)