Talk:License proliferation
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 2A02:A03F:88F:7A00:8B6:487A:4D83:13AD in topic Google's stance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI move to have the term "FLOSS" changed to FOSS, FOSS is the common term and is used twice prior in the article. I see that FLOSS is what the cite'd article uses, oh the irony.
So change it or leave it? Actually it might make for a very nice ironic joke. But changing it would likely improve the article's quality.
Google's stance
editDoes it still make sense to talk about Google now that they're shutting down their hosting activities? Their view hardly has any influence now. 2A02:A03F:88F:7A00:8B6:487A:4D83:13AD (talk) 06:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)