Talk:Library of Congress Classification:Class T, subclass TT -- Handicrafts. Arts and crafts

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Libraries Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article "issues" edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'll see what I can do with the issues raised if someone would explain why they're so badly in need of fixing. Currently, there are four problems listed. I have counter-arguments to three of them:

It needs additional references or sources for verification.
- Other subsections have one source -- the same one that I used here.
- The article's subject is of a nature where most other sources would essentially be copied from the one listed (or similar material from the same organization)
It may be confusing or unclear for some readers.
- No more so than any of the other articles for LoC sub-classifications.
It needs to be expanded.
- Expanded how? Every number listed in the source is either in the article or in a different subclass

The only on I won't argue with is cleanup. I won't say that I agree with it, but I won't beat you over the head with a cast-iron skillet for saying it's neccessary, either.

Any light that can be shed on these "issues" would be appreciated. — AnnaKucsma Speak! 18:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic