Talk:Liberty (division)

The temples

Are they really still liberties or Extra-parochial areas? MRSC • Talk 01:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

According to <http://www.middletemple.org.uk/Content.asp?PageID=105>, the Middle Temple still is a local authority aka liberty. "However, the Inns' rate-raising powers were undermined by the Local Government Finance Act (1988). Although continuing to stress their status as liberties, they agreed that the City Corporation should be the charging authority for the community charge and that the Inns should levy the agreed amounts on tenants." Ed Avis (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

List of liberties

Is this listing any UK area that has been an historical liberty or, some areas that by some quirk have remained liberties? When researching other subjects I often come across areas, such as villages or parishes, that are described as liberties. If it is the former description then this list could become impossibly long. Keomike (talk) 20:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the former. As you can see, the list is not impossibly long. Dadge (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberty (division). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120930021928/http://www.middletemple.org.uk:80/the_inn/middle-temple-as-a-local-authority.html to http://www.middletemple.org.uk/the_inn/middle-temple-as-a-local-authority.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718023443/http://www.agi.org.uk/storage/events/AGI2009Papers/MartinLaker.pdf to http://www.agi.org.uk/storage/events/AGI2009Papers/MartinLaker.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

East Smithfield Liberty

Should this redirect to St Botolph without Aldgate? The relevant section of East Smithfield also applies - and [1] (albeit another wiki) seems to contain relevant information. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Additions

Should Little Minories and Liberty of the Mint be added? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberty (division). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711020152/http://www.forestofbowland.com/node/2633 to http://www.forestofbowland.com/node/2633
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.agi.org.uk/storage/events/AGI2009Papers/MartinLaker.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)