Talk:Liberty (anarchist periodical)

Change of article name

@A. Randomdude0000 I notice you changed the name of the article from Liberty (1881–1908) to Liberty (19th century periodical). This means it is now in conflict with Liberty (British newspaper) which was also a 19th century periodical. Not sure what would be a better title. — LittleDwangs (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Oops! My rationale for making the change was that (1881-1908) was simply too vague, and needed more specificity. I wasn't aware that I had created a title conflict. Thanks for the catch, and for alerting me. Perhaps Liberty (periodical 1881–1908) or Liberty (19th century American periodical) would be better? A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

The title has been revised to Liberty ( 1881–1908 periodical). A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Czar, I noticed you changed the article name to Liberty (anarchist periodical), which puts it in conflict with Liberty (British newspaper) which was also an anarchist periodical. — LittleDwangs (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks and apologies, didn't see this discussion or the other periodical (newspaper?) at Liberty (disambiguation). I agree that the year range is too vague. Given that these are two anarchist periodicals with the same name, I suggest either disambiguating as "American/British anarchist periodical" or by the editor (Tucker/Tochatti) as they were certainly known by their editorship, or by Tochatti's subtitle "Liberty: A Journal of Anarchist Communism", if accurate. For most purposes, I think the Tucker periodical is much more widely known of the two. I.e., unless the British paper has more sources to unearth, I think it would be better off merged into James Tochatti's article whereas Tucker's periodical has many sources written specific to it. czar 13:52, 17 August 2024 (UTC)