Talk:Libertarian Party of Michigan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

listing moved edit

Libertarian elected to office in Michigan: David Eisenbacher is no longer in the "former" category because he has returned to the Troy City Council.--Libertyguy (talk) 01:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Libertarian Party.svg edit

The image Image:Libertarian Party.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Libertarian Party of Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Libertarian Party of Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Multi source bullet point refs edit

A few refs in the section about Creswell use multi-source bullet point format. Sometimes that is useful, but I suspect it is needlessly redundant here. Rather than picking and choosing sources myself, I suggest topic-specialists on this page consider which of the sources they consider best, and consider whether some of the bulleted-sources can be dropped as redundant. Alsee (talk) 05:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Creswell edit

Gregory Creswell was found to be a non-notable politician; the solution isn't to re-create an article about him here instead. You don't need a 10K edit, and 16 sources (including two superfluous "notes" about those sources) to communicate this idea. Some of these citations look like original research, and this kind of citation bombardment was explicitly rejected in the AfD. What he may or may not have done in a different campaign eleven years ago isn't relevant; the claims themselves are trivial (he ran advertisements), and the sourcing for them is weak. Spending half the length of this article talking about a candidate who has never been elected who is running unopposed in a single primary special election for a state house seat is the definition of undue weight. Mackensen (talk) 23:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Some of this section also duplicates (including references) what I added to "Overview": The first Libertarian primary candidate is Gregory Creswell, who had previously been the party's candidate for governor in 2006. Creswell is running to replace state representative Brian Banks and will be unopposed in the primary.[1] That seems adequate to me. Mackensen (talk) 23:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your work on the overview. I don't think two paragraphs are the same as an attempt to "re-create an article about him here instead." It certainly isn't "half the length." This was much shorter than the section you initially removed. You seem to object to the section in general. I will remove it because I have enough dialog with you as is, and your additions to the overview satisfy the minimum coverage, but I would like to know what you consider to be original research. Would you please specify this?--Libertyguy (talk) 02:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The article as it stood had 432 words of prose; 167 of them are in the Creswell section (more like 40%). Similar articles about state-level political parties aren't structured that way. They discuss the party, and don't include potted biographies of anyone--not candidates, not party officials. If you think this case is different I'm open to hearing why. What struck me as original research is this footnote concerning ballot access (reproduced).[2] Leaving aside whether Stempfle is a reliable source, this discussion of "Michigan Manuals" and such suggests to me original research to support a claim, instead of a reliable source coming out and making a claim. The entire reference is very unusual in its structure and formatting; it's not clear to me what part supports which claim. Alsee (talk · contribs) raised the same issue in the section above (#Multi source bullet point refs). Best, Mackensen (talk) 02:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Oosting, Jonathan (April 25, 2017). "Bert Johnson's brother among 14 running for state House". Detroit News. Michigan. Retrieved April 27, 2017.
  2. ^ The ballot access news sites an article by Greg Stempfle. Winger, Richard (April 6, 2017). "Michigan Libertarian Party Will Nominate by Primary for First Time, in Upcoming Special Legislative Election". "Ballot Access News". Retrieved 2017-04-30.
    older volumes of the Michigan Manual are available at Stanford University Libraries [1]. Much older volumes of the Michigan Manual are available at Google Books [2].

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Libertarian Party of Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply