Talk:Libertarian Party of Massachusetts
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 25stargeneral in topic Request for comment should the Info box read disputed or to one of the 2 organizations claiming to be the group?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Libertarian Party of Massachusetts article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Request for comment should the Info box read disputed or to one of the 2 organizations claiming to be the group?
edithow should the infobox be formatted to which group or should it read disputed?
Datmof (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- The scope of this article should continue to be the party long-recognized and still recognized by the MA Secretary of State, with candidates on the ballot and press coverage of these candidates. That is the only way the state party has any independent notability. Calling it disputed is misleading when the SoS does not consider there to be a dispute. Rather, there is a unilateral claim from a new, competing organization which lacks notability or any official status under MA law. 25stargeneral (talk) 16:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)