Talk:Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Latest comment: 7 years ago by MaxEnt in topic I am not a philosopher
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am not a philosopher edit
In his view, Rawls' philosophy shares the metaphysical assumptions of Kantian ethics, in which a purely noumenal self that is detached from all empirical constraints somehow retains motives that enable it to make choices.
Why can't this be formulated as an as-if rule as we do in computer science?
We would then imagine a purely noumenal self that is detached from all empirical constraints, while retaining the ability to make choices in the real world on the basis of the thought experiment. — MaxEnt 01:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
SoRRY. I already imaged my reply to your communist page...it livesa for eternaty ... tought shit to you communists