Talk:Libera Chat
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SamuraiSauce in topic Contested deletion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Libera Chat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encyclopaedic tone edit
IMO the History section reads a bit gossip-y. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- It's largely taken from Freenode#Ownership change and conflict. You're probably right that it is; I think with a little more time and outside reporting we'll probably have an easier time of giving an overview of what happened without repeating a blow-by-blow of allegations from both sides of the conflict, which is at the moment kind of all we've got. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
"Libera.Chat" or "libera.chat" edit
In the article it says "Libera Chat, stylized Libera.Chat". Are there any references for the capital L and C? --2003:DC:5F29:6601:67C6:F3D4:4F17:68FA (talk) 13:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- It seems to be how https://libera.chat/ themselves are stylizing it. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, the dot in any logo or name reference is stylistic only (except in the case of the complete domain 'libera.chat', which confusingly is almost the same string of characters). You can ask any Libera admin about it. I also expect the eventual end result of this conversation on the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki will include an official document or listing with the official name as verified by the Swedish government. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 22:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because this marking is just slander. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.127.111.212 (talk) 14:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... This article does not attack any person --SamuraiSauce (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)