This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Libcom.org is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I see this article was deleted twice in the past, so honus is on me to explain its notability. Asides from stating obvious facts, that Libcom.org is an important website amongst anarchists, and is reflected even among anarchist literature with 3,500+ mentions in Google Scholar, I've enclosed a chapter by Croeser, that extensively examines the usage/online behaviours of users on Libcom.org. I would argue this passes WP:BASIC and WP:WEBCRIT as I would argue it has a demonstrable influence in the field of anarchism, including academia Shushugah (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In case someone wants to use them in the article, the following sources (some of them criticised) were mentioned in the 3rd delete nomination discussions:
Ephemeral Journal paper on Music and Anarchism, writes a short paragraph reviewing 163 posts made on LibCom.org [1],
Zones of Proletarian Development refers to LibCom as "A more comprehensive list of autonomous libertarian activities which resist 'intrusive intervention' can be found on the excellent Libertarian Communist website https://libcom.org" [2],
The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism where Libcom is described as "a hub for libertarian communist ideas" (Chapter 5)
This journal article where in an overview of contemporary British anarchism Franks and Kinna (both leading British anarchist academics) list it as "Libcom.org : primary resource for UK anarchists : lively forums, news, blogs, information and support and an extensive library"
.svg){kind=icon}
The redirect Libcom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 14 § Libcom until a consensus is reached. Mach61 (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)