Talk:Liancourt Rocks dispute
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Barbeqmoon in topic Dokdo is South Korean territory
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liancourt Rocks dispute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dokdo is South Korean territory edit
Japanese dispute over Dokdo for taking over in 1905 was basically just an invasion/colonization of Korea that the US allowed as it was deemed fit to ally with Japan more than Korea (Joseon) at the time. If the Japanese claim over Dokdo is “legit”, the Japanese might as well say all of Korea is claimable. Additionally, with this logic, the UK might as well “claim” the territories they held by colonizing other lands. Barbeqmoon (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)