Talk:Liaison Committee (House of Commons of the United Kingdom)

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 14 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Liaison Committee. The result of the discussion was Moved to Liaison Committee (House of Commons of the United Kingdom).

Requested move 14 June 2022 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments7 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Liaison Committee (House of Commons of the United Kingdom). Disambiguation found to be needed due to the existence of other Liaison Committees not only in other countries, but in the UK as well. A disambiguation page will also be made as it was repeatedly requested. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Liaison Committee (UK) → Liaison Committee – WP:MALPLACED ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. Spekkios (talk) 01:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

There are 19 different notable organisations on WP that are called "liaison committee". I think we should probably leave this one where it is, and turn the base name into a dab page. Thoughts? Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Rename to Liaison Committee (House of Commons of the United Kingdom). Far too generic a term to not be disambiguated or even be disambiguated by country (which should be "United Kingdom" in any case). This committee is not even especially well-known, even in Britain. Liaison Committee should be turned into a disambiguation page. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per above, disambiguate the target per above -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 04:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Move to Liaison Committee (House of Commons of the United Kingdom) as Necrothesp suggests, and disambiguate, considering the other articles Liaison Committee (House of Lords) and Canadian House of Commons Liaison Committee. Adumbrativus (talk) 06:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic