Former good article nomineeLhasa was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Article Collaboration and Improvement DriveThis article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of July 31, 2005.

Country name missing in template edit

China missing in template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASaber91 (talkcontribs) 05:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sum doesn't equal total edit

From the last paragraph of the Lhasa#History section:

Official statistics of the metropolitan area report that 70 percent are Tibetan, 34.3 are Han, and the remaining 2.7 Hui

Loraof (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lhasa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 July 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved Alex ShihTalk 18:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply



LhasaChengguan District, Lhasa – The content of this article covers only Chengguan, which is just one of the districts of Lhasa (a prefecture-level city). The current name is inaccurate and does not conform with the usage by Wikipedias in other languages. 24.97.35.99 (talk) 03:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--Relisting.usernamekiran(talk) 19:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Support more accurate title, and in line with other language versions. feminist 10:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Strongly Support As I mentioned 2 years ago, it is not necessary to create a separate Lahsa article from the widely used term for the city of Lahsa. Jiangyu911 (talk) 14:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lhasa (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Lhasa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply